From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:06 +0900 Message-ID: <52F99056.6010906@samsung.com> References: <1392100183-30930-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <1540B9A3-2485-4149-81DD-7D86A532E5D4@arm.com> <2286031.FWmKXGrGIV@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:36288 "EHLO mail-pb0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751554AbaBMA4Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:56:25 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rp16so9970950pbb.6 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:56:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2286031.FWmKXGrGIV@wuerfel> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Ilho Lee , Thomas Abraham , Kumar Gala , Olof Johansson , Kukjin Kim On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 12 February 2014 13:04:40 Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On 12 Feb 2014, at 16:25, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared between arm= and arm64 that depend on it. >>> >>> We already converted some of them (those depending on ARCH_VEXPRESS= ) to >>> just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I=E2=80=99d like to se= e them as >>> defaulting to modules but I don=E2=80=99t think we are there yet (w= e had some >>> discussions at the last KS, I=E2=80=99m not sure anyone started loo= king into >>> this). >> >> I=E2=80=99m torn about this, I think for something like VEXPRESS it = makes sense, >> however I think its reasonable to still have an config symbol for a= full >> SoC family or something of that nature. > > I think for SBSA compliant systems, we should be able to live with a > generic ARCH_SBSA Kconfig symbol. For more irregular embedded platfor= ms, > we may need something more specific. > Basically, I agreed with Arnd's suggestion to use ARCH_SBSA. Or we need= =20 to define level in Kconfig like ARCH_SBSA_L1 for level1. BTW, how about= =20 compliant with SBSA Level1 and having some specific features? - Kukjin