Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	sunil joshi <joshi@samsung.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Szyprowski, Marek" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: remove hardware overlays disable from fimd probe
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:42:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <538C551E.30407@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538C4DE0.50801@gmail.com>

On 06/02/2014 12:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Rahul, Andrzej,
> 
> On 02.06.2014 11:42, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> On 2 June 2014 14:41, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Rahul,
>>>
>>> On 05/28/2014 08:11 AM, Rahul Sharma wrote:
>>>> System hangs when FIMD registers are accessed to disable
>>>> hardware overlays. This is because of the clocks which are
>>>> not enabled before register access.
>>>>
>>>> 'Hardware overlay disable' is cleaned from the FIMD probe.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> This patch causes regression on some exynos4210-universal_c210 devices,
>>> everything works expect colors are incorrect - it seems blue component
>>> is very dark, almost black.
>>>
>>
>> Oh.... Sorry for that. I did not see any problem on 5250/5420/5800. I do not
>> have setup for 4210. Better we should revert this patch.
>>
>> Would you please help me by verifying the following patch on 4210? This
>> is an alternate solution to the same problem.
>>
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg31426.html
>>
>> Thanks Andrej, for bringing it to notice.
> 
> I don't see how this patch could introduce such regression, as all the
> affected registers seem to be properly reconfigured in fimd_win_commit()
> anyway.
> 
> IMHO instead of reverting the patch, this issue should be investigated
> and fixed properly.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> 

I am looking at the problem, it is quite strange as it happens only on
one of two targets I have access to. Anyway it seems that something
should be added to fimd initialization sequence if we want to remove hw
accessing code from probe.

Regards
Andrzej

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-28  6:11 [PATCH] drm/exynos: remove hardware overlays disable from fimd probe Rahul Sharma
2014-06-02  9:11 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-06-02  9:42   ` Rahul Sharma
2014-06-02 10:11     ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-02 10:42       ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2014-06-02 11:48         ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-06-09  4:13           ` Inki Dae
2014-06-02 10:32     ` YoungJun Cho
2014-06-02 11:06     ` Inki Dae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=538C551E.30407@samsung.com \
    --to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joshi@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rahul.sharma@samsung.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox