From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] clk/samsung fixes for 4.1 Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 12:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <554747A6.7030605@samsung.com> References: <554105AC.8060800@samsung.com> <20150429231820.16410.26690@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:48565 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751344AbbEDKTo (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 06:19:44 -0400 In-reply-to: <20150429231820.16410.26690@quantum> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Turquette Cc: Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc Hello Mike, On 30/04/15 01:18, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2015-04-29 09:24:12) >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> clk/samsung fixes for 4.1 >> >> Fixes of clk definitions in recently added clock controller driver for >> exynos5433 SoC and enhancements for DVFS, proper system sleep and secure >> monitor calls support in this SoC. The exynos5420 patch fixes a serious >> system sleep regression introduced in 3.19. >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> clk: exynos5433: Add CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT to support DVFS for big.LITTLE core > > Above patch doesn't look like a fix for an introduced regression. >> Hyungwon Hwang (1): >> clk: exynos5433: Add DIV_CPIF to the list of stored registers on suspend > > Above patch doesn't look like a fix for an introduced regression. >> clk: exynos5433: Add CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag to clocks for SMC > > Above patch doesn't look like a fix for an introduced regression. >> Joonyoung Shim (1): >> clk: exynos5433: Add clock flag to support the DVFS of GPU > > Above patch doesn't look like a fix for an introduced regression. Apologies for mixing them up, I'm going to resend above 4 patches for 4.2. The DVFS related patches are indeed not critical, I thought especially the second and third patch above are good for early -rc, since they fix bugs in a driver which was first added in 4.1-rc1. Anyway, I'll resend the dropped patches for 4.2, thanks for queueing the remaining ones. -- Regards, Sylwester