From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung related to updating multi_v7_defconfig Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:16:36 +0900 Message-ID: <555FE304.5090706@kernel.org> References: <555D4BF5.20008@kernel.org> <2227456.dXyEpqfCYe@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:38956 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756569AbbEWCQr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 22:16:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2227456.dXyEpqfCYe@wuerfel> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , arm@kernel.org, Kevin Hilman , Kukjin Kim , 'Olof Johansson' , Javier Martinez Canillas On 05/23/15 00:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 21 May 2015 12:07:33 Kukjin Kim wrote: >> >> Here is multi_v7_defconfig update and mostly including regarding exynos >> stuff based on savedefconfig which could remove useless configs based on >> checking of dependencies. >> >> This series is based on v4.1-rc1 and I can provide resolution of >> conflicts with arm-soc/next/defconfig. See below. >> >> Note that, IMHO we need to check 'savedefconfig when defconfig is >> updated so that we could remove useless lines and avoid to miss some >> defconfigs because of dependency. >> >> Anyway please pull and if any concerns, please kindly let me know. >> Hi, > The conflict got a little too wild for my taste, so I dropped your > 'savedefconfig' commit and rebased the other ones on top of the > branch I already had. > OK, no problem :-) > Please check that the result is still ok for you. > When I checked, I didn't find any missing stuff from my side. Looks good, thanks. - Kukjin