From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Beata Michalska Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Update video-phy node with syscon phandle for Exynos3250 Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:50:30 +0200 Message-ID: <556433D6.8070307@samsung.com> References: <1426762587-24923-1-git-send-email-b.michalska@samsung.com> <555FF9AC.1060909@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <555FF9AC.1060909@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Sylwester Nawrocki , Javier Martinez Canillas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 05/23/2015 05:53 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/21/15 16:25, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski >> wrote: >>> 2015-05-21 10:57 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski : >>>> 2015-03-19 19:56 GMT+09:00 Beata Michalska : >>>>> As a follow-up to recent changes to Exynos mipi video phy >>>>> driver, introducing support for PMU regmap in commit >>>>> e4b3d38088df6f3acd40 ("phy: exynos-video-mipi: Fix regression >>>>> by adding support for PMU regmap") add a syscon phandle to >>>>> video-phy node to bring back to life both MIPI DSI displays >>>>> and MIPI CSIS-2 camera sensors on Exynos3250. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> >>>> Tested on Gear 2 (Exynos3250) board. >>> >>> Oh, I was too fast. It seems that "reg" property is not needed >>> anymore. Can you remove it? >>> >> >> After removing the reg property as Krzysztof suggested. >> >> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >> > will apply with changing as per you guys' review comment ;-) > > Thanks, > Kukjin > Apologies for not jumping in earlier, but I've been away for a while, with basically no e-mail access. Would You like me to resend the patch with the 'reg' property removed or will You handle it while applying the change ? Best Regards Beata