From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GPU-DRM-Exynos: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:17:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558EDAAF.30803@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D329D0.7050006@samsung.com>
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:54:45 +0100
>>
>> The functions phy_power_on() and vunmap() perform also input
>> parameter validation. Thus the test around their calls is not needed.
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c | 6 ++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> index 34d46aa..306cf1d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dp_core.c
>> @@ -1057,14 +1057,12 @@ static int exynos_dp_create_connector(struct exynos_drm_display *display,
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_phy_init(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>> {
>> - if (dp->phy)
>> - phy_power_on(dp->phy);
>> + phy_power_on(dp->phy);
>> }
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_phy_exit(struct exynos_dp_device *dp)
>> {
>> - if (dp->phy)
>> - phy_power_off(dp->phy);
>> + phy_power_off(dp->phy);
>> }
>>
>> static void exynos_dp_poweron(struct exynos_drm_display *display)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c
>> index e12ea90..0dd448a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fbdev.c
>> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void exynos_drm_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct exynos_drm_gem_obj *exynos_gem_obj = exynos_fbd->exynos_gem_obj;
>> struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
>>
>> - if (is_drm_iommu_supported(dev) && exynos_gem_obj->buffer->kvaddr)
>> + if (is_drm_iommu_supported(dev))
>> vunmap(exynos_gem_obj->buffer->kvaddr);
>>
>> /* release drm framebuffer and real buffer */
>>
>
> Acked-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Do the chances increase to integrate this update suggestion
into another source code repository?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-27 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402212321410.2043@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402231635510.1985@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402240658210.2090@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402241710370.2074@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien>
[not found] ` <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
[not found] ` <5317A59D.4@users.so urceforge.net>
[not found] ` <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net>
2014-11-20 10:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] [media] platform: Deletion of unnecessary checks before two function calls SF Markus Elfring
2014-11-21 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/1] thermal: Exynos: " SF Markus Elfring
2014-11-21 10:17 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-21 13:25 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-11-21 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] " SF Markus Elfring
2015-02-04 21:00 ` [PATCH] GPU-DRM-Exynos: Delete " SF Markus Elfring
2015-02-05 8:29 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-06-27 17:17 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2016-07-21 17:42 ` [PATCH] GPU-DRM-Exynos: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "vunmap" SF Markus Elfring
2016-07-21 18:07 ` Sean Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558EDAAF.30803@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox