From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: dts: Use labels instead of full paths for Exynos5 pinctrl nodes Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:27:06 +0900 Message-ID: <559CDEDA.50608@samsung.com> References: <1436333790-18219-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:35113 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933971AbbGHI1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:27:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <1436333790-18219-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas , Kukjin Kim Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08.07.2015 14:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Kukjin and Krzysztof, > > This is a trivial series that changes Exynos5 pinctrl dtsi files to extend > the pinctrl nodes using labels instead of full paths. > > Using labels is less error prone since a misstyped label leads to a build > error while full paths can lead to the creation of a new node instead of > overriding the original which makes the mistake harder to detect. > > I tested the changes by decompiling the Exynos5* dtbs and comparing before > and after. The resulting dts were identical modulo some node ordering due > the pinctrl include change. Is the DTB before and after the same? It should not change by re-ordering. Best regards, Krzysztof