From: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: refactoring/cleanup patches
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:04:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A37F0C.7030907@math.uni-bielefeld.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A361BF.8030904@samsung.com>
Hello,
Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On 07/12/2015 06:06 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>> Hello Andrzej!
>>
>> Just some small comments.
>>
>> It seems like linux-samsung-soc wasn't put into Cc for '[PATCH RESEND
>> 0/6] drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' (even though this series was),
>> maybe you should also forward the other series to this list.
>
> Yes, I forgot about it.
>
>>
>> This series doesn't apply cleanly when 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes'
>> is applied. E.g. the 'powered' boolean was removed by that series, but
>> here in patch 2/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling') it's
>> still there.
>
> 'drm/exynos: HDMI related fixes' removes powered field from
> mixer driver, and powered field in the patch 2/7 is from hdmi driver.
> So they should not interfere and for sure they do not interfere in my local git :)
> Have you any warning when you tried to apply those patches.
yes of course, otherwise I wouldn't point this out. The specific hunks
just fail.
Which is kinda obvious:
> @@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ struct hdmi_context {
> struct drm_device *drm_dev;
> struct drm_connector connector;
> struct drm_encoder *encoder;
> - bool hpd;
> bool powered;
> bool dvi_mode;
> struct mutex hdmi_mutex;
This doesn't apply when 'powered' is no longer ther.
With best wishes,
Tobias
>
>>
>> I also noticed that some of the patches ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove
>> private lock code') clash with Gustavo's latest cleanup series [1]. E.g.
>> your patch 3/7 ('drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code') touches
>> hdmi_commit() which was removed by Gustavo. Maybe you should coordinate
>> things with him?
>
> This is always problematic :) I can try to rebase my patches on Gustavo's
> if necessary. Gustavo, Inki what is your opinion?
>
> Regards
> Andrzej
>
>>
>>
>> With best wishes,
>> Tobias
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg45787.html
>>
>>
>> Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> Hi Inki, Joonyoung,
>>>
>>> These patches removes obsolete and old structures, to simplify further
>>> development. They should not change behavior of the driver.
>>>
>>> The patchset is based on exynos-drm-next plus my HDMI related fixes [1].
>>>
>>> The patchset was tested on Universal and Odroid U3.
>>>
>>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/132348
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Andrzej
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrzej Hajda (7):
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove old platform data code
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: add driver data pointer to private context
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove redundant configuration fields
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v13_conf struct
>>> drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v14_conf struct
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 860 ++++++++++-------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 245 insertions(+), 615 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 14:28 [PATCH 0/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: refactoring/cleanup patches Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: remove old platform data code Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: Simplify HPD gpio handling Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: remove private lock code Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: add driver data pointer to private context Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: remove redundant configuration fields Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v13_conf struct Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-09 14:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: remove hdmi_v14_conf struct Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-12 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] drm/exynos/hdmi: refactoring/cleanup patches Tobias Jakobi
2015-07-12 16:06 ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-07-13 6:59 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-13 9:04 ` Tobias Jakobi [this message]
2015-07-13 9:33 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-07-13 18:20 ` Tobias Jakobi
2015-07-14 6:43 ` Joonyoung Shim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A37F0C.7030907@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
--to=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox