From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos4210: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:02:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A45190.6090400@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2096384.dMD4qgzAC2@amdc1976>
On 13.07.2015 23:27, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday, July 13, 2015 01:20:41 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> On Monday, July 13, 2015 08:10:21 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> 2015-07-13 20:02 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 09:24:40 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 23.06.2015 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> On 23.06.2015 00:04, Michael Turquette wrote:
>>>>>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2015-06-21 18:46:26)
>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 22.06.2015 10:38, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-05-08 9:18 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-04-04 1:43 GMT+09:00 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For Exynos4210 platforms, add CPU operating points and CPU
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regulator supply properties for migrating from Exynos specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cpufreq driver to using generic cpufreq driver.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes by Bartlomiej:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - removed Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 support for now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Andreas Farber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rebased and applied to my tree, I'll sent it later to Kukjin unless he
>>>>>>>>>>> picks it by himself from LKML.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi, as far as I know, this is for v4.2 not v4.1 so it will be applied based on
>>>>>>>>>> v4.2-rc1 after v4.2-rc1 release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You mean it is for v4.3, not v4.2?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oops, yes v4.3.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the correction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kukjin & Krzysztof,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm confused on this point. I was planning to take patches 1, 2, 3, 5
>>>>>>> and 6 towards 4.2 (e.g. in the pull request that I'll send out this
>>>>>>> week).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is patch 4 going out for 4.2 or 4.3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is quite late for sending pull request to arm-soc for 4.2.
>>>>>> For example SoCFPGA pull request from last week was rejected:
>>>>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/417980
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, that was wrong link. Here it is:
>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg425911.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you want to take it for 4.2 then I am fine with it but this will
>>>>>> cause some easy but annoying conflicts. There aren't difficult - just
>>>>>> most of nodes in board DTS changed their place.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Example of resolution (target file after merge, with cpu nodes reordered
>>>>>> alphabetically):
>>>>>> https://github.com/krzk/linux/commit/2cec3cb48abaf44848c62f1c0836b772eb4680dd
>>>>
>>>> This patch is needed for v4.2 as other changes has been already
>>>> merged.
>>>>
>>>> Krzysztof/Kukjin, could you please take care of it?
>>>
>>> Of course! It is already in my queue. I'll send it later to Kukjin for
>>> 4.3 (unless he picks it also).
>>
>> It is in your queue for v4.3 but the patch is needed for v4.2,
>> without it cpufreq support will not work for Exynos4210 platforms.
>>
>>> BTW for other patchsets you still need acks from Samsung clock
>>> maintainers. Did you poke Sylwester or Tomasz about it?
>>
>> Sylwester, please review/ack Samsung specific clock changes in
>> Exynos5250 cpufreq and Exynos4x12 cpufreq patch series.
>>
>> Patch series:
>>
>> * [PATCH v3 0/4] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos5250 platform
>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/1/311)
>>
>> * [PATCH v2 0/7] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform
>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/419)
>>
>> Samsung clock specific changes:
>>
>> * [PATCH v3 1/4] clk: samsung: exynos5250: add cpu clock configuration data
>> and instantiate cpu clock
>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/1/313)
>>
>> * [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: samsung: exynos4x12: add cpu clock configuration data
>> and instantiate cpu clock
>> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/9/424)
>
> BTW corresponding changes for Exynos4210 has already been merged and 2 above
> patches are quite obvious so review should be very quick & simple.
>
> [ Unfortunately Sylwester is currently very busy with a more priority work so
> it may still take some time to get his ACKs. ]
The review would be fast and already Javier or me provided such.
Anyway if you want to merge it through different tree it would be
expected to get an ack from bypassed maintainer.
Especially that the distance between you and the bypassed maintainer was
~1 meter for the most of the time :) .
It is much longer distance between you and me now!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-14 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <'@samsung.com>
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES clock flag for Exynos cpu clock support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-13 14:13 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-06-18 19:58 ` Michael Turquette
2015-06-19 11:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-19 12:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-19 14:53 ` Michael Turquette
2015-06-20 10:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-20 19:13 ` Michael Turquette
2015-06-22 0:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: samsung: exynos4: add cpu clock configuration data and instantiate cpu clock Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos4210: add CPU OPP and regulator supply property Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-08 0:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-22 0:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-22 1:38 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-06-22 1:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-22 1:46 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-06-22 15:04 ` Michael Turquette
2015-06-22 23:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-06-23 0:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 11:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-13 11:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 11:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-13 11:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-13 14:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-07-14 0:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-06-24 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-08 0:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-14 5:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-03 16:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4210 specific cpufreq driver support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-14 5:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-13 14:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210 platform Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-14 4:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4210platform Kukjin Kim
2015-05-14 5:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-14 10:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-05-14 11:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers forExynos4210platform Kukjin Kim
2015-06-03 23:22 ` Kukjin Kim
2015-06-18 17:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-06-18 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A45190.6090400@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox