From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: CPUIdle for Exynos5422 Odroid-XU3/XU4 boards.
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:21:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D6D185.5070909@osg.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D6A23C.5020403@samsung.com>
[Adding Przemyslaw Marczak who was working on porting Odroid BL1/BL2/SPL]
Hello,
On 08/21/2015 05:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21.08.2015 12:41, Anand Moon wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 21 August 2015 at 06:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> On 21.08.2015 03:15, Anand Moon wrote:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> On 20 August 2015 at 21:40, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>> On 08/20/2015 12:54 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Krzysztof/Kukjim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CPUIdle seen to be not working for Exynos5422 Odroid boards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is their any way this feature will be implemented in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah a good willing to fix the bl1. More than one year asking for that !
>>>>> nooo way !!
>>>>>
>>>>> Your answer is at the end of
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-June/350632.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the explanation.
>>>>
>>>> I was just referring following the source code.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/hardkernel/linux/blob/odroidxu3-3.10.y/arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle-exynos5422.c
>>>>
>>>> It seem that cpufreq and cpuidle go hand in hand.
>>>
>>> Bartlomiej was working on cpufreq for Exynos542x:
>>> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1504.2/03139.html
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have also cpuidle and suspend features working on
>>> Exynos542x family but this depends on firmware. Some time ago I
>>> struggled with suspend on Arndale Octa (Exynos5420) and I failed. I
>>> think the firmware is the issue here.
There were a lot of Suspend-to-RAM bug fixes lately mostly related to
critical clocks being gated. It would be nice to give a try on recent
kernels and see if is still not working.
>>>
>>> Actually I am not sure what is your question Anand. You are asking if
>>> someone plans to do this?
>>
>> Yes I am asking are their plans to implement cpufreq and cpuidle simultaneously.
>
> There are no obstacles for implementing them simultaneously so the
> question is rather who plans to do the cpuidle driver for Exynos542x? I
If the firmware is in a good shape (unfortunately as mentioned by Daniel,
the one in the Odroids are not) then the generic ARM big.LITTLE CPUidle
driver (CONFIG_ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUIDLE) should work.
It is at least working for me on the Exynos5800 based Peach Pi Chromebook:
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/current_driver
big_idle
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state*/name
WFI
C1
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state*/usage
7745
10578
> don't... at least in nearby future. If I had some spare time then
> probably I would try to make suspend working.
>
Suspend-to-RAM is at least working on the Exynos5420 and Exynos5800
Chromebooks.
As you mentioned it may depend on the firmware so that does not hold
true for all the Exynos5420/5422/5800 boards but it would be good to
know what is the causing S2R to fail.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 10:54 CPUIdle for Exynos5422 Odroid-XU3/XU4 boards Anand Moon
2015-08-20 16:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-08-20 18:15 ` Anand Moon
2015-08-20 18:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-08-21 0:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-21 3:41 ` Anand Moon
2015-08-21 3:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-21 7:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2015-08-23 1:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-25 9:43 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-08-25 14:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-25 16:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-08-27 16:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-08-28 8:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-08-28 12:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-28 12:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-12 19:06 ` Amit Kucheria
2015-08-24 7:06 ` Przemyslaw Marczak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D6D185.5070909@osg.samsung.com \
--to=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=p.marczak@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox