From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5422: add missing parent GSCL block clocks Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:36:04 +0900 Message-ID: <56682E44.6020303@samsung.com> References: <1449582415-30164-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <5667B2F3.9040807@samsung.com> <5667FEF3.4080703@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5667FEF3.4080703@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com, Marek Szyprowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Figa , Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org W dniu 09.12.2015 o 19:14, Sylwester Nawrocki pisze: > Adding Stephen and linux-clk at Cc. > > On 09/12/15 05:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 08.12.2015 22:46, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >>>> This patch adds clocks, which are required for preserving parent clock >>>> configuration on GSCL power domain on/off. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 8 ++++---- >>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 2 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> I suppose that, with ack from clock folks, this can go through samsung-soc? > > I guess it makes more sense that making a stable branch with just > this patch to be pulled into arm-soc and clk tree. I'm fine with > applying this patch through arm-soc, but I think we also need > Mike's or Stephen ack for this. > > Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki I am fine with the branch approach (actually in such cases I make them anyway just in case). As you suggested I'll wait for Mike's or Stepen's acks. BR, Krzysztof