From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rtc: s5m: Cleanup by removing useless 'rtc' prefix from fields Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 08:53:37 +0900 Message-ID: <568B0601.5020808@samsung.com> References: <1451450847-928-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160104170841.GD32724@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:46939 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658AbcADXxn (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:53:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <20160104170841.GD32724@piout.net> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Sangbeom Kim , Alessandro Zummo , Lee Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Alim Akhtar , Yadwinder Singh Brar On 05.01.2016 02:08, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/12/2015 at 13:47:25 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote : >> Remove the 'rtc' prefix from some of the fields in struct >> s5m_rtc_reg_config because it is obvious - this is a RTC driver. No >> functional changes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> > > I was going to apply those patches but they don't apply cleanly on > rtc-next. Did I miss something? > Probably that's my fault because I rebased it on linux-next. I will rebase the patches on rtc-next and resend. Best regards, Krzysztof