From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rtc: s5m: Cleanup by removing useless 'rtc' prefix from fields Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 09:04:39 +0900 Message-ID: <568B0897.4020403@samsung.com> References: <1451450847-928-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20160104170841.GD32724@piout.net> <568B0601.5020808@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:9359 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753601AbcAEAEo (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:04:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <568B0601.5020808@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Sangbeom Kim , Alessandro Zummo , Lee Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Alim Akhtar , Yadwinder Singh Brar On 05.01.2016 08:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05.01.2016 02:08, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 30/12/2015 at 13:47:25 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote : >>> Remove the 'rtc' prefix from some of the fields in struct >>> s5m_rtc_reg_config because it is obvious - this is a RTC driver. No >>> functional changes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> >> >> I was going to apply those patches but they don't apply cleanly on >> rtc-next. Did I miss something? >> > > Probably that's my fault because I rebased it on linux-next. I will > rebase the patches on rtc-next and resend. Ah, no need for rebasing. I forgot about dependency - the support for S2MPS15 was added recently through Lee Jones' tree. Fortunately Lee put S2MPS15 patches in a separate branch and tag: "ib-mfd-regulator-rtc-4.5" This means that to apply the patches this is needed first: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=ib-mfd-regulator-rtc-4.5 Best regards, Krzysztof