From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rtc: max77686: Extend driver and add max77802 support Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:34:25 +0900 Message-ID: <56A02791.9010409@samsung.com> References: <1453310088-29985-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20160121003047.GF3367@piout.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni , Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 21.01.2016 09:30, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> I believe all patches should go through the RTC tree with proper acks or >> wait until the RTC patches land to pick the defconfig changes. >> > > I think Olof would prefer the last patches to go through arm-soc. That would be preferred but merging them before the 5/8 would cause a loss of functionality on these defconfigs making it non-bisectable approach. I think it would be good to preserve bisectability in that matter so either: 1. a tag from RTC on top of which these patches would be applied in arm-soc, 2. take them to RTC tree with our acks. Best regards, Krzysztof