From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 09:53:44 +0900 Message-ID: <56A17D98.7010907@samsung.com> References: <1453407813-14646-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <1453407813-14646-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:23338 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485AbcAVAxn (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:53:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <1453407813-14646-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi , Alexandre Belloni , Laxman Dewangan , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 22.01.2016 05:23, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length > to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > --- Tested on Trats2 board with max77686: Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof