From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laxman Dewangan Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:27:38 +0530 Message-ID: <56A85C52.6040607@nvidia.com> References: <1453865806-4661-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <1453865806-4661-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:9577 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753110AbcA0GIh (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:08:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1453865806-4661-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kukjin Kim , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Andi Shyti , Chanwoo Choi , Alexandre Belloni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 27 January 2016 09:06 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length > to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti > Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan