From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH v2] rtc: s3c: Document in binding that only s3c6410 needs a src clk Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:46:33 -0400 Message-ID: <5718CBA9.30801@osg.samsung.com> References: <1455545466-25709-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <20160328221915.GC2346@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160328221915.GC2346@piout.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hello Alexandre, On 03/28/2016 06:19 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 15/02/2016 at 11:11:06 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote : >> The S3C binding doc says that the RTC and RTC source clocks are required >> but the S3C driver supports different HW IP and only the s3c6410 needs a >> source clock. >> >> Fix the binding explaining that the source clock is only needed for the >> s3c6410-rtc compatible controller. >> >> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni >> >> --- >> Hello, >> >> This patch depends on a previous one that was picked by Rob Herring so >> this one has to go through his tree again and not through the RTC tree >> to avoid conflicts. >> > > Well, I'm queuing that one in rtc-fixes for 4.6 > Are you still planning to push this fix for v4.6? I don't see the patch in neither v4.6-rc4 nor linux-next. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America