Linux Samsung SOC development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
	m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos5433: Extend list of available AUD_PLL output frequencies
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 20:24:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A7AE1E0.8000509@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75cac4e7-9bbb-e591-36a1-dcacc3f94ace@samsung.com>

On 2018년 02월 07일 19:29, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 02/06/2018 03:44 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> When I developed the clk-exynos5433.c I referred to the following description.
>> TRM specified that "Samsung recommends only the values
>> between 252MH ~ 400MHz in the PMS2460X PMS value" for aud_pll.
> 
> Thanks, I somehow missed it. There is also another sentence pointing to
> a contact person if other values are needed.
> 
>> It looks like that you refer to clk-exynos5420.c driver.
>> But, I'm wondering exynos5433 might not guarantee the additional clock
>> of this patch as the stable clock.
> 
> I took the values from downstream SM-N910C_LL kernel, I would say they
> are well tested and reliable. How about adding just these 3 entries:
> 
> +	PLL_36XX_RATE(196608001U, 197, 3, 3, -25690),
> +	PLL_36XX_RATE(180633609U, 301, 5, 3,   3671),
> +	PLL_36XX_RATE(131072006U, 131, 3, 3,   4719),
> ?
>  
> They are needed for audio sample rates that are multiple of 32000, 44100
> or 48000 Hz. The AUD PLL frequency values which are currently defined
> are not useful for anything except fs 48000 (fpll = 393216000 Hz).

If you referred to SM-N910C released kernel, I agree.

> 
> We could add new PLL rates: 361267218, 262144000, but I'm not convinced
> these would be any better than values used in a shipped product. We would 
> need to confirm below values with the HW team, and I'm not sure what 
> would be the P, M, S, K set for 262144000 frequency.
> 
> 	PLL_36XX_RATE(361267218U, 301, 5, 2,   3671),
> 
> As it turns out, the 393216000 Hz entry needs correction, the actual 
> frequency value from the P, M, S, K equation is 393216003:
> 
> -	PLL_36XX_RATE(393216000U, 197, 3, 2, -25690),
> +	PLL_36XX_RATE(393216003U, 197, 3, 2, -25690),

As you described, 393216003 might be more correct than 393216000,
IMHO, I think that TRM specified 393216000 instead of 393216003,
because the following equation is clean without any decimal point.
- "393216000 / 8192 = 48000"

I have no any objection, if 393216003 is correct result.

Could you share your equation?
because your result is a little bit different of my result.
- my equation : ((mdiv + kdiv/65535) x 24MHz) / (pdiv x POWER(2,sdiv))

> 
> Hmm, I have tested with the PLL frequency set to 393216003 Hz and there
> are some glitches during audio playback, I can't get it to work properly.
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20180205142252epcas1p4471e32e2b513806420c64b323af2ffa6@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2018-02-05 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos5433: Extend list of available AUD_PLL output frequencies Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-05 14:22   ` [PATCH 2/3] clk: exynos5433: Allow audio subsystem clock rate propagation Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-06  4:06     ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-07 15:18       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-09  7:36         ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-12 11:45           ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-12 21:44             ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-05 14:22   ` [PATCH 3/3] clk: exynos5433: Add CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag to sclk_ioclk_i2s1_bclk Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-06  4:08     ` Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-14 14:52       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-06  2:44   ` [PATCH 1/3] clk: exynos5433: Extend list of available AUD_PLL output frequencies Chanwoo Choi
2018-02-07 10:29     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-07 11:24       ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2018-02-07 13:04         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2018-02-09  7:25           ` Chanwoo Choi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A7AE1E0.8000509@samsung.com \
    --to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox