Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] PM / Domains: Fix race conditions during boot

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>]

Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> writes:

> Changes in v3:
> 	-Rework the entire intermediate step which was suggested in v2.
> 	 That means solving the race condition, but also cope with PM domains
> 	 that are initialized in powered off state.
>
> Changes in v2:
> 	-Added some acks.
> 	-Updated commit messages.
> 	-Included a wider audience of the patchset. V1 was lacking SoC
> 	 maintainers.
>
> Here are link to the first patchset, were some discussion started.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=141208104729597&w=2
>
> There may be more than one device in a PM domain which then will be
> probed at different points in time.
>
> Depending on timing and runtime PM support, in for the device related
> driver/subsystem, a PM domain may be advised to power off after a
> successful probe sequence.
>
> A general requirement for a device within a PM domain, is that the
> PM domain must stay powered during the probe sequence. To cope with
> such requirement, let's add two new APIs, dev_pm_domain_get|put().
>
> These APIs are intended to be invoked from subsystem-level code and the
> calls between get/put needs to be balanced.
>
> dev_pm_domain_get(), tells the PM domain that it needs to increase a
> usage count and to keep supplying power. dev_pm_domain_put(), does the
> opposite.

I'm confused. Why arent' pm_runtime_get*() and pm_runtime_put*() working?

What's not explained here (or what I'm not understanding) is why a PM
domain is powering off if it has active devices.

Kevin