From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FE4C4332F for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230113AbiKYOr0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:47:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45576 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230144AbiKYOrY (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 09:47:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AACDE3B for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id j16so7196028lfe.12 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=usClvSs3mC6FvIhfguF/sEt/gkxumcuZsEzXV26BLwCRWyr07wpUDcacmF61zVLKPR 4b46+DrsjeGTpJs4Rz6cKLkXOJNviO0ZeBoqcGZGt6PWmxFN+kR+a96LaG8VwLpSqDkx goU+yxqpDJ/wWC5qZvAINZkaHs5Yqu6Dyn/gkN36gYSpsynBgMP78DiVuICmU5IoYSDu ZSN5X5Za9PqaptEEca8OmXdQ9gvV5B+AF+roHy6kclTYwEc+dAsg6/RiBrprc8VtRRtb ue6EdI+9kSpsFmIkikRBiN+RbXp81fj4XYloUMa16gJjB+8ssQrKA0NK0EVWlEfJjx5e wKrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=osoEBytHjlQAPUyZve5rkRqahTmWVeqKGttLOtMjR3Y=; b=kb4IyqudNjxInhESxKZvQELaIkHerTwfybdbknUl/4HLIFHutN0h5WDlaV5nBLzGPZ wyAZ/A0MFx7e8kP0yLDCqY7vD2iCgGVCa1k8y9+pFXhHE3jf4bBbJS/QTfmhUsFgvwvv g0wQeHNeriYpbFHmyGqCv/MfWWswaBZzSmkpCml/KEpG5ZN0L9vtG+UOlyREv1R1y6Ew F6YTObt1rBk60mGE4CBeKnR3QIUMxp+1CNHS3iwKISXwreE8LA5RlSDFs3AnmF0EXyqB o211cXCeTBR2YpJTbAf8XzcZX3Sa1FaSyTQMohx0qtstd/q/hq/h31zUkdtvCtts1mDc XhyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnme+RhP27A+EiGn9uV1tUxImYymhbS0jQlnALtBNYwEzHVPlqu AHGqCdvJyQ/GyA0abkTseEA6NA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4JdsPg2OacWHAZHBS95kHhrvSJgsXU9oA5FBTdtRat1RDp/3S8jHWNMMuKkVsrI0TT4mXz8A== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4843:0:b0:4a2:1169:3934 with SMTP id 3-20020ac24843000000b004a211693934mr13530237lfy.279.1669387640881; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (088156142067.dynamic-2-waw-k-3-2-0.vectranet.pl. [88.156.142.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020a05651234ca00b00494942bec60sm557057lfr.17.2022.11.25.06.47.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 06:47:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 15:47:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add dedicated SYSREG compatibles to Exynos5433 To: Sam Protsenko Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Sriranjani P , Chanho Park References: <20221125112201.240178-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20221125112201.240178-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 25/11/2022 15:22, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 05:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski > wrote: >> >> Exynos5433 has several different SYSREGs, so use dedicated compatibles >> for them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> --- >> >> Cc: Sriranjani P >> Cc: Chanho Park >> Cc: Sam Protsenko >> --- > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Just curious: what is the rationale for adding those more specific > sysregs? AFAIR, e.g. in Exynos850, different SysReg instances have > pretty much the same register layout. > On Exynos5433 all these blocks have different registers. Are you saying that Exynos850 has four (or more) sysregs which are exactly the same? Same registers? Why would they duplicate it? Best regards, Krzysztof