From: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
To: vinholikatti@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
추헌광 <hg.chu@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH][SCSI] scsi: ufs: get a TM service response from the correct offset
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:22:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000401d20a27$da459040$8ed0b0c0$@samsung.com> (raw)
From: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
When any UFS host controller receives a TM(Task Management)
response from a UFS device,
UFS driver has been recognize like receiving a message of
"Task Management Function Complete"(00h) in all cases, so far.
That means there is no pending task for a tag of the TM request
sent before in the UFS device.
That's because the byte offset 6 in TM response which has been used
to get a TM service response so far
represents just whether or not a TM transmission passes.
Regarding UFS spec, the correct byte offset to
get TM service response is 15, not 6.
I tested that UFS driver responds properly for the TM response
>From a UFS device with an reference board with exynos8890, as follow:
No pending task -> Task Management Function Complete (00h)
Pending task -> Task Management Function Succeeded (08h)
Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: HeonGwang Chu <hg.chu@samsung.com>
Tested-by: : Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 +
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index 42c459a..89c121e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ enum {
MASK_QUERY_DATA_SEG_LEN = 0xFFFF,
MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN = 0xFFFF,
MASK_RSP_EXCEPTION_EVENT = 0x10000,
+ MASK_TM_SERVICE_RESP = 0xFF,
};
/* Task management service response */
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index e8a706b..c641cd3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -3013,8 +3013,8 @@ static int ufshcd_task_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 index, u8 *resp)
if (ocs_value == OCS_SUCCESS) {
task_rsp_upiup = (struct utp_upiu_task_rsp *)
task_req_descp[index].task_rsp_upiu;
- task_result = be32_to_cpu(task_rsp_upiup->header.dword_1);
- task_result = ((task_result & MASK_TASK_RESPONSE) >> 8);
+ task_result = be32_to_cpu(task_rsp_upiup->output_param1);
+ task_result = task_result & MASK_TM_SERVICE_RESP;
if (resp)
*resp = (u8)task_result;
} else {
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 23:22 Kiwoong Kim [this message]
2016-09-21 20:34 ` [PATCH][SCSI] scsi: ufs: get a TM service response from the correct offset Martin K. Petersen
2016-09-27 22:38 ` subhashj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000401d20a27$da459040$8ed0b0c0$@samsung.com' \
--to=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=hg.chu@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).