Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] implement transport scan callout for iscsi

James Bottomley
2005-05-25T20:54:07Z

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:32 -0700, Dmitry Yusupov wrote:
> Those are very strong arguments against having MC/S implemented for the
> software iSCSI initiator. Especially true is (a). Not that many targets
> offers MC/S, since according to RFC it implies ERL=2.
>
> Now, back to open-iscsi initiator business and its mainline acceptance.
> We are going to met your requirement and will remove multi-connection
> support before next patch-set submission. As Mike C. mentioned before,
> it is fairly easy to do since the whole connection management resides in
> user-space. Though it will exists as a kernel patches on our web site
> (http://www.open-iscsi.org) for those who wonders.
>
> Are there are some other requirements we need to met besides MC/S
> removal ?

Actually, I don't think so. I'd like some convergence on what should be
in the transport class, since there have been a set of conflicting
patches from Mike Christie and Nicholas Bellinger, but that's not a
requirement ... what's there already can go in and we can sort out the
residue in-tree.

James