Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] implement transport scan callout for iscsi

Ming Zhang
2005-05-25T13:00:46Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 637 bytes --]

about this 400K IOPS, both ini and target are using your HW solution?

ming

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 21:28 -0400, open_iscsi wrote:
> Regarding the numbers, we get 400,000 IOPS with our hardware solution
> using
> multiple connections and multiple micro-engines. I have not tried
> multi-pathing but I can tell you that I had to count clocks to get
> that
> number and found that even a few extra clocks could mean a lot. So
> since
> multi-pathing takes a lot of extra clocks, then I think there is a
> benefit.
> However with a software solution the extra clocks for the multi-
> pathing may
> not be significant.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]