From: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] - mpt fusion -
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:14:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002c01c65f69$319745c0$201015ac@ericmoore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060414010405.GB23580@infradead.org
On Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:04 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>> I'll explain the problem.
>> The sas drivers have a rphy to rphy relationship. An rphy
>> created on a hba phy points to the expander phy. Then the expander
>> phy creates a rphy pointing back to the same hba rphy. The expander
>> phy which contains the rphy pointing back to the hba phy, contains
>> the attributes device_type = SAS_END_DEVICE, and target_port_protocals =
>> 0.
>> Hence the recent change in sas_rphy_add() make it drop down to
>> scsi_scan_target, whereas before there was sepecial handling to
>> prevent this case from happening. With this change, the mptsas slave
>> entry
>> points are called to enumerate the rphy that points back to the hba phy.
>> The target id in our data structures is the same as a real target device
>> on another phy. Thus we end up mapping the same target to two different
>> rphys.
>> To fix this, I added a check in mptsas_slave_alloc to make sure the
>> requested rphy is mapped to a true end device.
>
> This needs to be fixed in the transport class again.
>
Christoph can you help me on this, please?
The original sas_rphy_add() function from three weeks back works for mptsas.
I'm not sure why that change was made, and whether reverting back to its orginal code
would break the other sas driver.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-14 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 22:08 [PATCH 2/3] - mpt fusion - Moore, Eric
2006-04-14 1:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-14 2:14 ` Moore, Eric [this message]
2006-04-14 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2006-04-15 0:45 ` Moore, Eric
2006-04-15 0:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002c01c65f69$319745c0$201015ac@ericmoore' \
--to=eric.moore@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox