From: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] first cut at infrastructure for handling different devicetypes in the sas class
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:17:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004201c63fb7$ee8b4ef0$1e1015ac@ericmoore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1141445103.5397.19.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com
On Friday, March 03, 2006 9:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> This one actually does the end devices, since that's all I really have
> to work with in my setup. However, I can do the expanders in the same
> way. The idea is to make the rphy embedded in the enveloping device
> structure, so the code which doesn't care about type can still treat the
> code as a simple rphy, and the code that does care can cast out to the
> device type.
I'm not clear what your intent is here. All the info is there, so I'm not sure
why this change is needed. The sas_transport implementation Christoph
has layed out is a flat model. In /sys/class/sas_phy, you will see all the
phys for both hba and expander all togeather in the tree.The rphy is at the
end of a phy link, where it the target protocol could be SMP, STP, SATA,
or SAS; e.g. you can see that in rphy->identify.target_port_protocols.
You can figure out whether its an end device by the attribute by
rphy->indentify.device_type, which could be SAS_END_DEVICE,
SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER, SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER, or
SAS_PHY_UNUSED.
>
> Temporarily, because mptsas doesn't do this, I've put a flag in to
> indicate whether the rphy is enveloped or not, however, if we enforce
> this for everything, then eventually that would go away.
>
Ok, I'm not sure what this comment means, in respect to mptsas.
The mptsas driver is reporting all device types to the transport class,
as defined in the SAS spec.
> If everyone's OK with this, I'll do expanders next.
Ok, the mptsas driver is already reporing expanders to transport class.
This is handled from mptsas.c, in mptsas_probe_one_phy(), when
we call sas_phy_add(). When there is any attached devices at
the end of a phy, we call sas_rphy_add(). Both these functions
exported from sas_transport, work well for both hba, and expanders.
The patch I sent yesterday is adding support when someone needs to
add a expander after the start of day, or reomove one. Its responding
to the firmware DISCOVERY event.
Eric Moore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-04 4:05 [RFC] first cut at infrastructure for handling different device types in the sas class James Bottomley
2006-03-04 8:28 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-03-04 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-04 18:33 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-05 3:42 ` Luben Tuikov
2006-03-04 18:17 ` Moore, Eric [this message]
2006-03-06 16:39 ` [RFC] first cut at infrastructure for handling different devicetypes " James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004201c63fb7$ee8b4ef0$1e1015ac@ericmoore' \
--to=eric.moore@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).