Re: Why is the kernel complaining about large SCSI LUNs

Bryan Henderson
2005-01-08T01:56:21Z

>It currently looks like the REPORT_LUNS command
>didn't return any data in even though returned status was GOOD, so it's
>probably a fault either of the device or the controller.

Isn't it also a bug in Linux? If the device didn't return data, the error
message should be "REPORT_LUNS is broken -- it didn't return any data"
instead of "LUN is too big" followed by contents of storage that was never
set to anything by anybody, right?