From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/17] scsi: core: Call .eh_prepare_resubmit() before resubmitting
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:38:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <033a9b3f-c1d8-46b5-e4e4-350308648679@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49bdae64-6162-5802-2dfb-c433ab48b5f9@acm.org>
On 2023/08/17 23:26, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/17/23 04:10, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 8/17/23 04:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * Returns true if the commands in @done_q should be sorted in LBA order
>>> + * before being resubmitted.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool scsi_needs_sorting(struct list_head *done_q)
>>> +{
>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry(scmd, done_q, eh_entry) {
>>> + struct request *rq = scsi_cmd_to_rq(scmd);
>>> +
>>> + if (!rq->q->limits.use_zone_write_lock &&
>>> + blk_rq_is_seq_zoned_write(rq))
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Comparison function that allows to sort SCSI commands by ULD driver.
>>> + */
>>> +static int scsi_cmp_uld(void *priv, const struct list_head *_a,
>>> + const struct list_head *_b)
>>> +{
>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *a = list_entry(_a, typeof(*a), eh_entry);
>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *b = list_entry(_b, typeof(*b), eh_entry);
>>> +
>>> + /* See also the comment above the list_sort() definition. */
>>> + return scsi_cmd_to_driver(a) > scsi_cmd_to_driver(b);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void scsi_call_prepare_resubmit(struct list_head *done_q)
>>> +{
>>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *next;
>>> +
>>> + if (!scsi_needs_sorting(done_q))
>>> + return;
>>
>> This is strange. The eh_prepare_resubmit callback is generic and its name does
>> not indicate anything related to sorting by LBAs. So this check would prevent
>> other actions not related to sorting by LBA. This should go away.
>>
>> In patch 6, based on the device characteristics, the sd driver should decides
>> if it needs to set .eh_prepare_resubmit or not.
>>
>> And ideally, if all ULDs have eh_prepare_resubmit == NULL, this function should
>> return here before going through the list of commands to resubmit. Given that
>> this list should generally be small, going through it and doing nothing should
>> be OK though...
>
> I can add a eh_prepare_resubmit == NULL check early in
> scsi_call_prepare_resubmit(). Regarding the code inside
> scsi_needs_sorting(), how about moving that code into an additional
> callback function, e.g. eh_needs_prepare_resubmit? Setting
> .eh_prepare_resubmit depending on the zone model would prevent
> constification of struct scsi_driver.
Sounds OK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 19:53 [PATCH v9 00/17] Improve performance for zoned UFS devices Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] block: Introduce more member variables related to zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] block: Only use write locking if necessary Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:01 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] block/mq-deadline: Only use zone " Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:02 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] scsi: core: Call .eh_prepare_resubmit() before resubmitting Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-18 2:38 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] scsi: core: Add unit tests for scsi_call_prepare_resubmit() Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] scsi: sd: Sort commands by LBA before resubmitting Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-18 2:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] scsi: core: Retry unaligned zoned writes Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] scsi: sd_zbc: Only require an I/O scheduler if needed Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] scsi: scsi_debug: Support disabling zone write locking Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-17 14:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] scsi: scsi_debug: Support injecting unaligned write errors Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 11:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] scsi: ufs: hisi: Rework the code that disables auto-hibernation Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework the code for disabling auto-hibernation Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:40 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] scsi: ufs: sprd: " Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] scsi: ufs: Rename ufshcd_auto_hibern8_enable() and make it static Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:49 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 21:48 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] scsi: ufs: Simplify ufshcd_auto_hibern8_update() Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] scsi: ufs: Forbid auto-hibernation without I/O scheduler Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 18:50 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-16 19:53 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] scsi: ufs: Inform the block layer about write ordering Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 19:00 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 19:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-17 21:47 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-17 22:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-08-18 0:19 ` Bao D. Nguyen
2023-08-18 17:56 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=033a9b3f-c1d8-46b5-e4e4-350308648679@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox