From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sumit Saxena Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 9/18] megaraid_sas : Support for Avago's Single server High Availability product Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:10:56 +0530 Message-ID: <0b14766f13fa5bd085122e7abcb690b3@mail.gmail.com> References: <201504231104.t3NB4P3F030217@palmhbs0.lsi.com> <20150511091948.GH28820@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:35112 "EHLO mail-qk0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753314AbbEKJk6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 05:40:58 -0400 Received: by qkhg7 with SMTP id g7so82850471qkh.2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150511091948.GH28820@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, thenzl@redhat.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, jbottomley@parallels.com, Kashyap Desai >-----Original Message----- >From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] >Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 2:50 PM >To: Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com >Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; thenzl@redhat.com; >martin.petersen@oracle.com; jbottomley@parallels.com; >kashyap.desai@avagotech.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/18] megaraid_sas : Support for Avago's Single server >High Availability product > >Did you test this on non-x86? It seems like the dmi functions are properly >stubbed out, but I'd really prefer an explicit statement that it is known to >work. SSHA feature is limited to x86 platform only. This code is tested for non x86 platforms(tested on PPC). We don't need buffer returned by "dmi_get_system_info()" on non x86 platforms as we don't support SSHA for non x86 platforms.