From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E0B46420; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="LvqGtz/K" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279868.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.24/8.17.1.24) with ESMTP id 3BHGovfq007703; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:03:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= qcppdkim1; bh=5xfkxt1tTtX55og26Me4Y1UbjKI2CLMX4oDvwX0MEjc=; b=Lv qGtz/K5MopP7VH2jP3SF1BSKh2vLLtBfUDXlKJvoFuz9xnhLU7S3wZOnN5UFgD1o ciVZrKL/x0V7+u7+QrJMMfzQIdSzXlKcBOyPLnGWxxxtgmiC2JIbHl0oOx/oxbLw ybsqpd1QAB9Fe4GyG6i4xHG431oSOUsAv8/X9qvNAeWxIo0aahjTQBkvzoipP7NG jaXums8Zs1z0yaU4wG3WAsnmfGwxfrMBowja+EZ4tPCChJ1YqrFixJO8Ynz6EVjL kND/CydxDigKmIHPgvRFGjRF92Q1wEIq/HGgsOpj28qCY8RdHcX79zGcuNZnTxmt bykOjZZVEGyiKLon3t/A== Received: from nalasppmta04.qualcomm.com (Global_NAT1.qualcomm.com [129.46.96.20]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3v14yg2gu5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com [10.47.209.197]) by NALASPPMTA04.qualcomm.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTPS id 3BHH3Sil002967 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 Dec 2023 17:03:28 GMT Received: from [10.216.17.18] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.40; Sun, 17 Dec 2023 09:03:23 -0800 Message-ID: <0debdc71-2ee2-4a0d-9789-5aea4191a305@quicinc.com> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 22:33:20 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver To: Avri Altman , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Peter Wang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno CC: Alim Akhtar , Bart Van Assche , Stanley Jhu , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "quic_cang@quicinc.com" , "quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com" References: <20231213124353.16407-1-quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Naresh Maramaina In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nalasex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.197) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: chd14hn0oHDl8Z55uw2-yAAsp83Sp7Pe X-Proofpoint-GUID: chd14hn0oHDl8Z55uw2-yAAsp83Sp7Pe X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-12-09_02,2023-12-07_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=709 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2312170127 On 12/15/2023 2:35 PM, Avri Altman wrote: >> Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver. This improves random io >> performance by 15% for ufs. >> >> tiotest benchmark tool io performance results on sm8550 platform: > Will it possible to provide test results for non-ufs4.0 platforms? > e.g. for SM8250, just to know if it would make sense to backport this to earlier releases. > Hi Avri, Performed tiotest benchmark tool io performance test on SM8450 platform and see good improvement there as well. > Thanks, > Avri Thanks, Naresh.