public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes and cleanups for the new command allocation code
Date: 04 Feb 2003 17:03:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1044399797.3484.15.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030204202935.A325@lst.de>

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 13:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> --- 1.64/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	Tue Jan 28 23:09:29 2003
> +++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c	Tue Feb  4 20:19:00 2003
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
>  }; 	
>  #undef SP
>  
> -struct scsi_core_data *scsi_core;
>  
>  /*
>   * Function:    scsi_insert_special_cmd()
> @@ -814,9 +813,10 @@
>  		SCpnt = (Scsi_Cmnd *) req->special;
>  		SRpnt = (Scsi_Request *) req->special;
>  		
> -		if( SRpnt->sr_magic == SCSI_REQ_MAGIC ) {
> -			SCpnt = scsi_getset_command(SRpnt->sr_device,
> -						    GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (SRpnt->sr_magic == SCSI_REQ_MAGIC) {
> +			if (SDpnt->device_busy >= SDpnt->queue_depth)
> +				return BLKPREP_DEFER;
> +			SCpnt = scsi_get_command(SRpnt->sr_device, GFP_ATOMIC);

Actually, I don't necessarily think we want to do this.

I think we should throttle in the request_fn not in the prep_fn.  The
reason is the way the block queue works:  If we have a prepped request
ready to roll, it will go straight through the request fn (without
sending it back through prep again).  Thus, we can have a fully prepared
command ready for immediate issue as soon as the device returns one of
its slots and therefore we keep the pipeline packed as tightly as
possible given the maximum number of outstanding commands constraint. 
It also means that we have all the memory allocations completed by the
time we try to issue the command, rather than trying the memory
allocations as part of the prep function for the next issue.

James


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-04 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-04 15:23 [PATCH] fixes and cleanups for the new command allocation code Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-04 16:16 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-04 16:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-04 17:19     ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-04 17:57       ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-04 18:03         ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-04 18:08           ` Luben Tuikov
2003-02-04 18:33       ` James Bottomley
2003-02-04 19:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-04 23:03           ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-02-05  1:25             ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-05  1:53               ` James Bottomley
2003-02-05  5:15                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-02-05 15:22                   ` James Bottomley
2003-02-05 15:59                     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1044399797.3484.15.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox