From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
pbadari@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch for playing] Patch to support 4000 disks and maintain backward compatibility
Date: 11 Apr 2003 15:14:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050092073.2078.219.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200304111945.h3BJjU409008.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 14:45, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> I think compatibility is very important.
> Linux does not arbitrarily break old systems. The aim must be
> to have all combinations of (old/new) kernel with (old/new) glibc
> to work well in all situations where old kernel + old glibc worked.
Well, if you're going to do this, at least make it possible to tie all
the sd devices to a single major (i.e. the numeric compatibility layer
simply maps to the new single major scheme internally). It would also
be nice for numeric compatibility to be a compile time option too...
It's also possible that SCSI may not be the only consumer of such a
compatibility layer (IDE also has multiple majors), so it may be
worthwhile putting it somewhere more globally useful (like
fs/block_dev.c)
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-11 19:45 [patch for playing] Patch to support 4000 disks and maintain backward compatibility Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-11 20:14 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-04-11 23:21 ` Joel Becker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-13 13:59 Paul McKenney
2003-04-12 1:13 Paul McKenney
2003-04-12 14:14 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-11 21:13 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-11 18:07 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-11 19:12 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-11 11:42 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-11 14:33 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-11 16:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-11 0:13 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-10 23:53 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-11 1:09 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-11 10:09 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-04-11 16:12 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-10 23:33 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-10 23:37 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-10 23:09 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-10 23:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-10 22:09 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-10 22:22 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-10 23:57 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-10 20:39 Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-10 20:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-04-11 0:08 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-11 1:25 ` Badari Pulavarty
2003-04-11 15:43 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1050092073.2078.219.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox