From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
USB Developers <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
USB Storage List <usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net>,
Linux SCSI list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: exclude certain commands from emulated SCSI hosts
Date: 21 Apr 2003 11:20:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050942042.2269.3.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030420143546.D20891@one-eyed-alien.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]
On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 16:35, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 02:33:51PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > I've tested this, and it works well. Linus, if you'll take this I've got
> > several more patches -- ones to make usb-storage use this to cut some
> > undesireable commands, and one to fix up the INQUIRY probing in scsi_scan.c
> > to be compatible with the filter code.
>
> Here is my patch to the SCSI scanning code. Basically, if the first
> INQUIRY for 36 bytes works, but a later one fails because of the filter, we
> should still accept the device.
>
> Linus, please apply. I'll push the usb-storage patches via Greg K-H once
> these are accepted.
Actually, I'm not very keen about the levels of nested inquiry in this.
How about the attached instead?
James
[-- Attachment #2: tmp.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1141 bytes --]
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 1.77 vs edited =====
--- 1.77/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Sun Apr 20 18:21:18 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Mon Apr 21 11:17:20 2003
@@ -1001,6 +1001,7 @@
unsigned char scsi_cmd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
int possible_inq_resp_len;
+ repeat_inquiry:
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk(KERN_INFO "scsi scan: INQUIRY to host %d"
" channel %d id %d lun %d\n", sdev->host->host_no,
sdev->channel, sdev->id, sdev->lun));
@@ -1067,8 +1068,14 @@
SCSI_LOG_SCAN_BUS(3, printk(KERN_INFO "scsi scan: 2nd INQUIRY"
" %s with code 0x%x\n", sreq->sr_result ?
"failed" : "successful", sreq->sr_result));
- if (sreq->sr_result)
- return;
+ if (sreq->sr_result) {
+ /* if the longer inquiry has failed, flag the device
+ * as only accepting 36 byte inquiries and retry the
+ * 36 byte inquiry */
+ printk(KERN_INFO "scsi scan: %d byte inquiry failed with code %d. Consider BLIST_INQUIRY_36 for this device\n", sreq->sr_result);
+ *bflags |= BLIST_INQUIRY_36;
+ goto repeat_inquiry;
+ }
/*
* The INQUIRY can change, this means the length can change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030322193046.A17056@one-eyed-alien.net>
[not found] ` <20030322193149.B17056@one-eyed-alien.net>
2003-03-23 3:37 ` PATCH: exclude certain commands from emulated SCSI hosts Matthew Dharm
2003-03-23 4:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-23 7:31 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-03-23 7:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-23 18:13 ` [usb-storage] " Matthew Dharm
2003-03-24 1:05 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-03-24 1:26 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-24 1:37 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-03-24 1:39 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-24 7:04 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-03-24 15:15 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-24 16:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-24 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-24 16:52 ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-24 16:56 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-24 17:30 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-05 15:30 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-05 19:27 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-05 19:45 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-05 19:55 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-05 20:08 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-06 0:20 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-06 0:22 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-06 15:39 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-07 22:33 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-07 23:14 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-08 0:51 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-20 21:33 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-20 21:35 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-21 16:20 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-04-21 17:02 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-21 16:28 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-21 17:01 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-21 19:23 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-21 19:35 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-21 21:27 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-21 23:37 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-21 21:28 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-04-21 23:45 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-03-24 1:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-24 6:58 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-04-22 17:37 [usb-storage] " James Bottomley
2003-04-22 18:13 ` Alan Stern
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-22 19:30 Andries.Brouwer
2003-04-22 19:41 ` James Bottomley
2003-04-22 19:50 Andries.Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1050942042.2269.3.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mdharm-scsi@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox