public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: requeuing a Scsi_Cmnd?
Date: 12 May 2003 09:44:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052750688.1769.27.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EBEB1D5.3040300@pobox.com>

On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 15:25, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> This question applies to 2.4 as well as 2.5 (I believe the strategies 
> are different for the two?)
> 
> Suppose I am passed several Scsi_Cmnd structures via ->queuecommand. 
> TCQ depth is >1.  An event causes the entire queue to be aborted, but I 
> know that the majority of the queue was actually ok.  So, my LLD would 
> need to requeue and resend most of the recently-aborted Scsi_Cmnds.

You keep finding these unhandled condidions, sigh.  The correct thing to
do (since this is a situation identical to QErr set) is to return a
check condition to the failing command and to return a status of TASK
ABORTED for all the others (SPC3).  Of course, the SCSI-2 behaviour was
just to expect all tasks to be silently aborted on QErr=1.  Neither of
these, of course, is coded into the mid-layer.

> How do I tell the SCSI layer to requeue and resend a Scsi_Cmnd [almost] 
> immediately?

Probably the best thing to do is to return DID_BUS_BUSY which will force
a fast retry.  Note, that's the driver return, *not* the status BUSY,
which will force a requeue and take longer---DID_BUS_BUSY will retry
immediately from the SCSI tasklet.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-12 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-11 20:25 requeuing a Scsi_Cmnd? Jeff Garzik
2003-05-12  5:43 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-05-12 14:44 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2003-05-12 18:12   ` Luben Tuikov
2003-05-12 20:30     ` James Bottomley
2003-05-13  0:20     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-30 23:48       ` Andre Hedrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1052750688.1769.27.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox