From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: use_10_for_ms revisited? Date: 29 Jun 2003 13:36:55 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1056911816.10896.207.camel@mulgrave> References: <3EFE8784.4000101@pobox.com> <20030629102222.GA14962@win.tue.nl> <3EFF14BD.3030406@pobox.com> <20030629173632.GA15024@win.tue.nl> <3EFF28AC.104@pobox.com> <20030629110205.A4728@one-eyed-alien.net> <3EFF2D45.1040203@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nat9.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.137]:39175 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265724AbTF2SWt (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:22:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3EFF2D45.1040203@pobox.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Matthew Dharm , Andries Brouwer , SCSI Mailing List Actually guys, by penguin fiat number: torvalds@home.transmeta.com|ChangeSet|20030621190214|57300 We have been setting use_10_for_ms to one for every device in .73 Now, our current setup can't handle the 10->6 fallback, but I've fixed that in the recent BK. Given that there have been no reported problems (other than from our inability to interpret 10 by mode sense data), I'm inclined to leave it this change in. This rather pre-empts the slave_configure setting of the flags, though. James