From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: patmans@us.ibm.com
Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net,
usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [usb-storage] Re: [linux-usb-devel] [2.6-test] Bug in usb-storage or scsi?
Date: 11 Sep 2003 14:04:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063310694.3347.1.camel@patehci2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030910170227.C3367@beaverton.ibm.com>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104839042700001&r=1&w=2
Thanks, there I find 44 posts dated since 2003-03 with Subject's like:
"PATCH: exclude certain commands from emulated SCSI hosts".
By the way, Google yields a slightly different set of 44 posts:
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=linux.scsi.20030322193705.C17056%40one-eyed-alien.net
In both archives I think I see much sense:
> > From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb () one-eyed-alien ! net> ...
> >
> > (a) don't ask for EVPD data, ...
> > (b) assume ... only 36-bytes of INQUIRY data, ...
> > (c) ... assume write-enabled for all disk-like media.
>
> From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds () transmeta ! com>
>
> suggest ... make the Linux SCSI layer
> ... use the sequences of commands that "that other OS" uses ...
> "don't use commands that haven't gotten much testing" ...
I haven't yet reviewed the rest.
Pat LaVarre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-11 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3F5E434D.6080801@unixsol.org>
2003-09-10 16:23 ` [linux-usb-devel] [2.6-test] Bug in usb-storage or scsi? Alan Stern
2003-09-10 18:16 ` [usb-storage] " Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 18:49 ` sg MiB writes scheduling while atomic Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 19:30 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-16 6:35 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-09-16 11:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-16 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-14 23:36 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 20:08 ` [PATCH] mount -w of dvd+rw etc. in vanilla 2.6 Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 22:49 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-09-22 14:52 ` max GiB written per boot Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 20:51 ` unsolicited sense in 2.6.0-test5 usb-storage.ko Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 21:03 ` [usb-storage] " Alan Stern
2003-09-10 21:24 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-10 21:52 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-09-10 22:08 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-12 0:21 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-12 0:29 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-16 11:28 ` Douglas Gilbert
2003-09-11 0:02 ` [linux-usb-devel] [2.6-test] Bug in usb-storage or scsi? Patrick Mansfield
2003-09-11 20:04 ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2003-09-11 20:05 ` Alan Stern
2003-09-11 20:19 ` James Bottomley
2003-09-12 21:17 ` Alan Stern
2003-09-11 20:42 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-12 19:59 ` Alan Stern
2003-09-12 19:18 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-12 18:43 ` Pat LaVarre
2003-09-12 20:56 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-09-12 21:53 ` Pat LaVarre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1063310694.3347.1.camel@patehci2 \
--to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox