From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: udf folders pointing to self and above Date: 29 Sep 2003 16:03:12 -0600 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1064872992.5458.50.camel@patehci2> References: <1064864262.4262.49.camel@patehci2> <1064870151.5458.20.camel@patehci2> <20030929143457.3def59f4.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:51873 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262985AbTI2WCy (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:02:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030929143457.3def59f4.rddunlap@osdl.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: rddunlap@osdl.org Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Linux filesystems ... in the kernel tree) > should be discussed on open mailing lists [such as] > linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org ... Thanks for that prompt correction, sorry I needed it. Accordingly now, To linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org I have forwarded my post noting "lost+found" "shall not point to itself or to a higher parent in the directory hierarchy". Sounds like I'm getting confused somewhere near finding udf-0.9.7/ and linux/fs/udf/ simultaneously available. Perhaps we intend for newbies to use udftools-1.0.0b2/ together with linux/fs/udf/ no matter that udftools-1.0.0b2/ appears together with udf-0.9.7/. Or maybe we're not supposed to use the udftools-1.0.0b2/mkudffs/mkudffs that mostly works. Maybe we're supposed to begin by discovering how to overcome: $ uname -r 2.6.0... $ sudo /sbin/mkfs -t udf /dev/loop0 mkfs.udf: No such file or directory $ Pat LaVarre