From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] correct module refcounting
Date: 28 Oct 2003 15:46:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1067377564.1788.39.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
There's a race window between doing the last scsi_device_put and having
the devices actually released where the module may be unloaded. The fix
is to move the module accounting into the
scsi_allocate_sdev/scsi_free_sdev pieces of the SCSI routines.
I also think we probably want to move sdev_gendev population into
scsi_allocate_sdev. Note this will change how we do initial scans
because now we'll be using the generic device release infrastructure to
free even temporary devices. Unless anyone has a better idea...?
Finally, when this is done, we can take a device reference over both
scsi_get_command/scsi_put_command and also within the scsi_request_fn so
we know the device can never be released while it has outstanding
commands or while we are running its queues.
James
===== drivers/scsi/scsi.c 1.130 vs edited =====
--- 1.130/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Mon Oct 27 06:01:49 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi.c Tue Oct 28 15:39:10 2003
@@ -897,10 +897,6 @@
return -ENXIO;
if (!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
return -ENXIO;
- if (!try_module_get(sdev->host->hostt->module)) {
- put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
- return -ENXIO;
- }
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_get);
@@ -915,7 +911,6 @@
*/
void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
- module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_put);
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 1.110 vs edited =====
--- 1.110/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Mon Oct 27 06:01:50 2003
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c Tue Oct 28 15:39:00 2003
@@ -192,6 +192,9 @@
struct scsi_device *sdev, *device;
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!try_module_get(sdev->host->hostt->module))
+ goto out;
+
sdev = kmalloc(sizeof(*sdev), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!sdev)
goto out;
@@ -299,6 +302,7 @@
spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->host->host_lock, flags);
kfree(sdev->inquiry);
+ module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
kfree(sdev);
}
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 21:46 James Bottomley [this message]
2003-10-29 0:17 ` [PATCH] correct module refcounting Mike Anderson
2003-10-29 0:42 ` James Bottomley
2003-10-29 1:46 ` Mike Anderson
2003-10-31 12:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-31 15:00 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1067377564.1788.39.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox