Re: [PATCH] sym53c8xx PPR negotiation fix

Doug Ledford
2003-11-01T00:03:49Z

On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 18:55, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> > Yeah, the appropriate time to check that bit would be at
> > slave_configure() time. (Hmmm...I should have documented that...)
>
> BTW, slave_destroy() doesn't seem to be called after a probe
> for a target fails due to a selection timeout. Is this the
> expected behavior? I only keep persistent allocations after
> slave_configure() is called, so this doesn't affect my drivers,
> but the behavior isn't what I expected. This is 2.6.0-test9.

I haven't been able to follow 2.5/2.6 SCSI stuff as close as I wanted,
but originally I thought it did call slave_destroy() even if it never
called slave_configure()....hmmm...maybe I should go check my stuff back
then...I could be wrong on that.

--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606