From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] mode sense madness always use page 8 Date: 07 Nov 2003 09:13:20 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1068221599.2286.30.camel@patrh9> References: <1067531731.4250.11.camel@pathost1.iomegacorp.com> <20031030091808.A6781@beaverton.ibm.com> <1067535485.6411.42.camel@pathost1.iomegacorp.com> <20031030100501.A7250@beaverton.ibm.com> <1067541899.1141.4.camel@ronald.kuetemeier.com> <20031030134850.A9076@beaverton.ibm.com> <1067551081.1138.7.camel@ronald.kuetemeier.com> <1067558384.14409.50.camel@patrh9> <20031031101645.A14729@beaverton.ibm.com> <3FAAD532.2060300@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:25263 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264448AbTKGQNs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:13:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3FAAD532.2060300@torque.net> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: dougg@torque.net Cc: patmans@us.ibm.com, ronald@kuetemeier.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@one-eyed-alien.net, james.bottomley@steeleye.com Ouch, sorry. Already now I tried splitting off this digression by changing the Subject line, but I only knew to cc Patrick M, not the others here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106816572904919 List: linux-scsi Subject: sg utils sg_io -i 0x24 -y "12 00:00:00 24 00" Date: 2003-11-07 0:38:36 I will now forward a copy of that to Doug G - that post includes a rewrite in what I regard as readable .c of the core of plscsi - and I will then proceed there to answer the other points I see Doug G now kindly raises. > ... A complete build procedure for the 2002-9-22 plscsi we have appears at: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=106755844319144 List: linux-scsi Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] mode sense madness always use page 8 Date: 2003-10-30 23:59:45 So far offline these past couple of weeks the count is Two people confused by discovering with their Linux they DO NOT have to substitute g++ for gcc, and One person confused by discovering that with their Linux they DO have to substitute gcc for g++. I believe I do understand the root evil at fault, I'll explain that too. Pat LaVarre