From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Peripheral qualifier 1 not considered in scsi_probe_and_add_lun Date: 27 Nov 2003 09:55:08 -0600 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1069948509.1837.36.camel@mulgrave> References: <200311252037.34015.krmurthy@cisco.com> <1069773808.2061.6.camel@mulgrave> <200311271849.15241.krmurthy@cisco.com> <200311272026.11922.krmurthy@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nat9.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.137]:8199 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264545AbTK0PzS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:55:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200311272026.11922.krmurthy@cisco.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Krishna Murthy Cc: SCSI Mailing List , davmyers@cisco.com On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 08:56, Krishna Murthy wrote: > Shouldn't the same apply for peripheral qualifier 1. This is what the SCSI > spec has to say about 1: > The device server is capable of supporting specified peripheral device type > on this logical unit. However the physical device is currently not connected > to this logical unit. We handle PQ 1 later, because it indicates a transient connection condition. See scsi_add_lun(). James