public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: EXT / DEVOTEAM VAROQUI Christophe <ext.devoteam.varoqui@sncf.fr>,
	"'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin Peschke3 <MPESCHKE@de.ibm.com>,
	"Robert J. Adams (jason)" <radams@siscom.net>
Subject: Re: Mount by WWN (FC, using qlogic 2200)
Date: 04 Feb 2004 18:23:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1075936996.2029.131.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB4AE9EAB.C15E2C56-ON87256E30.007E8F0D-88256E30.007F5E0C@us.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 18:12, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> But it doesn't identify the "device" as Linux defines a device.  Setting
> aside multiple paths for the moment, a Linux sd device corresponds to an
> FCP logical unit, and the WWN identifies an FCP target (aka physical unit).
> I.e. where a physical unit has multiple logical units, multiple linux sd
> devices can have the same WWN.

Actually, the SPC-3 (rev 16) section 7.6.4.1 does say the Device
Identification VPD Page ... [shall apply] to the logical unit.

Of course, not all devices obey this, as you say, but still.

James



       reply	other threads:[~2004-02-04 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OFB4AE9EAB.C15E2C56-ON87256E30.007E8F0D-88256E30.007F5E0C@us.ibm.com>
2004-02-04 23:23 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-02-05  0:33   ` Mount by WWN (FC, using qlogic 2200) Bryan Henderson
2004-02-05 13:56     ` Tom Coughlan
2004-02-05 15:10       ` James Bottomley
2004-02-05 16:38         ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-02-05  9:52 EXT / DEVOTEAM VAROQUI Christophe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-04 19:58 Martin Peschke3
2004-02-04 20:06 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-04 20:15   ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-02-04 10:19 EXT / DEVOTEAM VAROQUI Christophe
2004-02-04 18:39 ` Robert J. Adams (jason)
2004-02-04  1:27 NH Support

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1075936996.2029.131.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=MPESCHKE@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=ext.devoteam.varoqui@sncf.fr \
    --cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=radams@siscom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox