From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] bug fixes for scsi for linux-2.6.3-rc1
Date: 08 Feb 2004 12:01:55 -0500
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1076259717.2055.11.camel@mulgrave>
References: <1076256895.2055.6.camel@mulgrave>
	<20040208161911.GF24334@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
	<1076258392.2055.9.camel@mulgrave>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:52894 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263861AbUBHRCC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:02:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1076258392.2055.9.camel@mulgrave>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 11:39, James Bottomley wrote:
> Hmm, missed that.
> 
> That would make the safest course of action to leave that in, and redo
> the true fix after 2.6.3 is released.
> 
> Hang on, I'll redo the scsi-for-linus-2.6 tree.

OK, I've reconstituted

bk://linux-scsi.bkbits.net/scsi-for-linus-2.6

without that patch.

James