From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] aeventd logging application (Part 1) Date: 13 Feb 2004 17:04:44 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1076709884.2159.415.camel@mulgrave> References: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F2552AD@otce2k03.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:9904 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267200AbUBMWEv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:04:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189F2552AD@otce2k03.adaptec.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Salyzyn, Mark" Cc: linux-scsi On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 16:48, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > I expect this to be rejected for inclusion to the kernel source tree ... > in that case the patch may just be done standalone (patch -p5). Well, I can satisfy your expectation on that score ;-) The rule is no user level tools at all in the kernel that aren't necessary for the kernel compile, no matter how closely they're tied to the kernel's operation. Even things like udev don't get to go into the kernel sources. James