public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
	viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	hch@infradead.org, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	pbadari@us.ibm.com, willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: lots and lots of disks again
Date: 17 Feb 2004 12:57:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077040659.2186.31.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040217155024.GB4282@pclin040.win.tue.nl>

On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 10:50, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:18:07AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The correct way to solve this is an all or nothing migration gated by a
> > boot time flag.
> 
> Yes, I was also thinking of boot time flags, but not all-or-nothing.
> Almost nobody actually needs these five thousand disks, and programs
> like LILO know about major 8, so I can even imagine that someone with
> lots of disks would like the boot disk to remain sda (8,0) even when
> all the others become (1049,*)-(1073,*).
> 
> Then what is the boot parameter? I don't know. Anything.
> Say, scsi-legacy=sda,sdb,sde.

But this is complexity for no gain.

The proposal is very simple: You want large numbers or discs or large
numbers of partitions, you get fixed tools and use a flat space on the
new major number.  You want legacy, you don't do anything for 2.6; for
2.7 you'll need to specify a boot flag.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-17 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-04 10:45 lots and lots of disks again Andrew Morton
2004-02-10 11:04 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 11:26   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 13:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 15:47       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 15:52         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-10 16:08           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 20:10             ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-10 20:11               ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-10 20:58               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:21                 ` viro
2004-02-10 21:34                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 21:42                     ` viro
2004-02-10 22:28                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-10 18:26         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 14:56           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 21:28             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:09               ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-11 22:29                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-11 22:53                   ` viro
2004-02-12 15:00                     ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 15:20                       ` James Bottomley
2004-02-12 15:57                       ` viro
2004-02-12 16:18                         ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-12 16:43                           ` James Bottomley
2004-02-16 12:40                             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 22:57                               ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17  0:56                                 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17  7:57                                   ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:08                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:28                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-17 14:49                                   ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 15:18                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-02-17 15:27                                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-29 16:41                                         ` James Bottomley
2004-02-29 23:31                                           ` Kurt Garloff
2004-03-03 19:30                                           ` Mike Anderson
2004-03-03 19:55                                             ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-17 15:50                                       ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-17 17:57                                         ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-02-17 18:44                                           ` Andries Brouwer
2004-02-13  0:05                       ` Kurt Garloff
2004-02-16 12:31                         ` Kurt Garloff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1077040659.2186.31.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=garloff@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox