From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: bug 2400 Date: 01 Apr 2004 17:40:33 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1080859235.2117.61.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040401131502.41136788.akpm@osdl.org> <1080856352.5300.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:31977 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263105AbUDAWks (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Apr 2004 17:40:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1080856352.5300.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: gulickconsulting@direcway.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, SCSI Mailing List On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 16:52, Matt Gulick wrote: > Where you will get into trouble is that SCSI is not considered to be a > 'Dynamic' bus. Devices do not normally come and go, while USB and 1394 > devices are 'Hot Plugable'. It isn't? considering all the refcounting work that's gone into the SCSI stack to make it support hotplug transports, I don't think such a blanket statement is supportable. James