From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
greg@kroah.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: bug 2400
Date: 02 Apr 2004 13:13:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080929583.1804.122.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040402174442.GE3880@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 12:44, Mike Anderson wrote:
> Where does the last put come from? How do you close the open race or
> know when the final put_disk has been called? SCSI cannot do this alone
> as we have created and registered an object in another subsystem
> (alloc_disk and add_disk) and we have no indication when that objects
> ref count has reached zero.
>
> Or
>
> As I previous stated in the thread below I have the gendisk /
> block layer locking mis-understood and there is something that SCSI can
> do.
well, sr has elected to merge these, so it takes a reference to
sdev_gendev on first open and releases it on last close of the block
device. This is what ties the SCSI model into the final put_disk().
We founder on calling driver ->remove before the final put of
sdev_gendev.
Anything with objects in more than one refcounted subsystem is
responsible for tying the refcounts together uniformly.
There should be no open race as long as we error out correctly if a
reference to the underlying sdev_gendev cannot be obtained (because the
object is being destroyed). sr seems to do this correctly. The
indication when the non-scsi object's refcount reaches zero is given to
us because at that point the sr code does a put of the sdev_gendev (and
if this is the last put, that should trigger cleanup).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 21:15 bug 2400 Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 21:52 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 22:48 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:40 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-01 22:53 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 23:07 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-04-01 23:32 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 0:29 ` Steven Dake
2004-04-02 8:43 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 16:45 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 17:05 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 17:44 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 18:13 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-04-02 23:40 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03 0:25 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04 1:40 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 15:23 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04 16:46 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 17:04 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 3:17 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 14:59 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-05 21:27 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:00 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 22:10 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-06 14:10 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 14:09 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 16:24 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-08 18:33 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 19:44 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-05 13:30 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2004-04-04 18:16 ` David Brownell
2004-04-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 3:54 ` David Brownell
2004-04-05 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 23:23 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2004-04-06 1:19 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 6:52 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-04-06 14:03 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-07 9:19 ` Oliver.Neukum
2004-04-06 15:10 ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 16:16 ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 16:55 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-06 17:13 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 23:36 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-03 0:11 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03 0:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 4:33 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-05 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 21:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 13:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 23:06 ` Greg KH
2004-04-09 11:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 14:03 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-05 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 15:09 Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080929583.1804.122.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox