From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
greg@kroah.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug 2400
Date: 04 Apr 2004 13:04:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1081098273.2112.18.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0404041216040.14668-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 12:46, Alan Stern wrote:
> Ah, you have left out the third, bad alternative: open succeeds, user gets
> an fd that points to a deallocated device. More details below...
No, that would be a bug. I'm looking for evidence that such a bug exists
in sd.
> Let's consider a simple example, one that doesn't have all the
> complexities of the sr driver with its multiple driver layers. The
> usb-skeleton program in drivers/usb makes a good illustration; I added a
> semaphore to it some time ago to protect against exactly this sort of
> race. Without that semaphore, here's what can happen:
>
> Open process: Disconnect process:
>
> Get minor number from inode
> Lookup USB interface using
> minor number
> Get device pointer from the
> interface's private data
> and check it's not NULL
This is what's wrong. Here you should get a reference to the device
pointer (that's what scsi_device_get() actually does for us). If the
ref getting routine comes back with an error, you may not proceed. If
it comes back with a device, you own a reference to it and may go on
(even if the device is now gone, the structure will behave correctly).
> Get device pointer from the
> interface's private data
> Set the private data to NULL
> Lock the device sem
> Unregister the minor number
> Terminate ongoing I/O operations
> Clear the device->present flag
> Unlock the device
> Since the open count is 0,
> deallocate the device structure
You're not obeying the object lifetime rules here. The device may be
gone but the device structure must stay around (obviously in a special
state) until the last reference is dropped. Only after that may you
start nulling things out and killing it.
> Lock the device sem --> oops
This is because you're not using refcounted objects correctly.
If anyone can find a similar bug in the SCSI ULD's, I'll fix it, that's
why I asked for an example in sd (or sr with the current fixes) way back
in this thread.
James
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-04 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 21:15 bug 2400 Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 21:52 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 22:48 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:40 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-01 22:53 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 23:07 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-04-01 23:32 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 0:29 ` Steven Dake
2004-04-02 8:43 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 16:45 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 17:05 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 17:44 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 18:13 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 23:40 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03 0:25 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04 1:40 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 15:23 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04 16:46 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 17:04 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2004-04-05 3:17 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 14:59 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-05 21:27 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:00 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 22:10 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-06 14:10 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 14:09 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 16:24 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-08 18:33 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 19:44 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-05 13:30 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2004-04-04 18:16 ` David Brownell
2004-04-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 3:54 ` David Brownell
2004-04-05 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 23:23 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2004-04-06 1:19 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 6:52 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-04-06 14:03 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-07 9:19 ` Oliver.Neukum
2004-04-06 15:10 ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 15:47 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 16:16 ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 16:55 ` Alan Stern
2004-04-06 17:13 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 23:36 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-03 0:11 ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03 0:16 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 4:33 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-05 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 21:07 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 13:56 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:04 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 14:09 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 23:06 ` Greg KH
2004-04-09 11:28 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 14:03 ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-05 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 15:09 Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1081098273.2112.18.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox