public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Gulick <gulickconsulting@direcway.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	greg@kroah.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug 2400
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 14:44:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1081453443.4777.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0404081430000.961-100000@ida.rowland.org>

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 13:33, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Matt Gulick wrote:
> 
> > OK, Silly question or maybe not.
> > 
> > When writing drivers for MacOS ( 7-9 & X) and Windose (98 - XP) and
> when
> > I architected the USB 2.0 stack at Adaptec for 98SE, ME & 2k, we
> solved
> > this issue with a simple heart beat task.
> > 
> > Every so often (1-3 seconds) any device that was at risk of removal
> > would receive a TEST UNIT READY cdb.
> > 
> > Using the model of 1394, USB, ... being treated as a device with no
> > media inserted (like a CD drive is treated), then you can query the
> > device for media availability.
> > 
> > Using the USB model of 7 tiers of devices and most hubs having 4
> ports
> > (7 port hubs are just two 4 port hubs internally connected) you can
> have
> > way more than 15 SCSI ID's.  By treating each USB as having its own
> ID
> > (EHCI USB chips typically have three USB identities of 1 EHCI and 2
> OHCI
> > interfaces) and the devices on that bus that are mass storage class
> > devices using SBP-2 or SBP-3 would be a LUN on that device.
> > 
> > By treating each bus as a virtual device, the main struct can be
> static
> > with LUN children added or removed as needed.
> > 
> > Any thoughts on this?
> > 
> > Matt
> 
> I think you're talking about a different problem.  Sending heartbeats 
> solves the problem of detecting media availability and device 
> availability.  It doesn't solve the problem we're discussing here,
> which 
> is how to tear down the device driver stack without causing any
> errors, 
> particularly if the user tries to access the device while the stack is
> being deconstructed.
> 
> Alan Stern

True.  This only mitigates the need for the SCSI subsystem from having
to release device structures that might be used for logical SCSI Bus
housekeeping.

I will have to dig into the Linux architecture model for SCSI to put
this in Linux form vs what is done elsewhere.

I'll be back.  ;-)

Matt


----------------------------------------
Matt Gulick
Sr. Staff Engineer
Adaptec, Inc.
gulickconsulting@direcway.com
matt_gulick@adaptec.com
(715) 426-0884



  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-08 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-01 21:15 bug 2400 Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 21:52 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:08   ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 22:48     ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 22:40   ` James Bottomley
2004-04-01 22:53     ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-01 23:07 ` Matthew Dharm
2004-04-01 23:32 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02  0:29   ` Steven Dake
2004-04-02  8:43   ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 15:57     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 16:45       ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 17:05         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 17:44           ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-02 18:13             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 23:40               ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03  0:25                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04  1:40                   ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 15:23                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-04 16:46                       ` Alan Stern
2004-04-04 17:04                         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05  3:17                           ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 14:59                             ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-05 21:27                             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:00                               ` Alan Stern
2004-04-05 22:10                             ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-06 14:10                               ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 14:09                               ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 16:24                                 ` Matt Gulick
2004-04-08 18:33                                   ` Alan Stern
2004-04-08 19:44                                     ` Matt Gulick [this message]
2004-04-05 13:30                           ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2004-04-04 18:16                       ` David Brownell
2004-04-04 18:42                         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05  3:54                           ` David Brownell
2004-04-05 21:44                             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 23:23                               ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2004-04-06  1:19                                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06  6:52                                   ` Oliver Neukum
2004-04-06 14:03                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-07  9:19                                       ` Oliver.Neukum
2004-04-06 15:10                                   ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 15:47                                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 16:16                                       ` David Brownell
2004-04-06 16:55                                       ` Alan Stern
2004-04-06 17:13                                         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-02 23:36   ` James Bottomley
2004-04-03  0:11     ` Mike Anderson
2004-04-03  0:16       ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05  4:33     ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-04-05 14:09       ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 21:07       ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06  9:22         ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 13:56           ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06 14:04             ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-06 14:09               ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 23:06         ` Greg KH
2004-04-09 11:28           ` James Bottomley
2004-04-05 14:03     ` Jens Axboe
2004-04-05 21:08       ` James Bottomley
2004-04-06  9:22         ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-06 15:09 Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1081453443.4777.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=gulickconsulting@direcway.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox