From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Wagland Subject: RE: megaraid: ABORTING problem Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:15:24 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1081869323.2113.16.camel@morsel.kungfoocoder.org> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57033BC51F@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-out4.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.5]:62728 "EHLO smtp-out4.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263609AbUDMPPn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:15:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57033BC51F@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Atul Mukker Cc: Linux SCSI mailing list On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 17:09, Mukker, Atul wrote: > > In trying to do some performance analysis on my LSI Login > > SATA-150-6, I > > > > megaraid: ABORTING-188cf36 cmd=2a > > megaraid: ABORTING-188cf36[52], fw owner. > > > You seem to be running a older version of the driver. Can you upgrade to the > latest 2.10.3 or 2.20.x.x and re-test. Also, what is the firmware version on > this controller. > > -Atul Mukker Ah. Guess I had better get to work adding in sysfs support to the new unified driver then ;-) This was the 2.6.4 kernel driver, and from /proc/hba0/config I get: Version =712T:G116, DRAM = 64Mb I was running these tests as part of a baseline to see what, if any, performance differences there would be with the new unified driver. Should this be fixed in that new driver? Thanks in advance, Paul