From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Q: aacraid stability on 64-bit Linux? Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:45:57 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1082025957.4691.2.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> References: <407E18B1.30508@neopathnetworks.com> Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-axj5Xk7jiD051c87fTyg" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:6326 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262142AbUDOKqH (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:46:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Dimitris Michailidis , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org --=-axj5Xk7jiD051c87fTyg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The I2O based Adaptec drivers are not 64bit clean at all and there > seems to be nobody interested in fixing this (it's a huge task)=20 > The aacraid driver seems to mostly work if you use the latest=20 > version. this is not quite true anymore; someone is fixing generic I2O to work with the adaptec hardware and he's quite interested (and actually working on) making that 64 bit clean/ --=-axj5Xk7jiD051c87fTyg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAfmfkxULwo51rQBIRAuD7AJ4iUlHAdHlFLZ3SFbFNukDnKOjvrgCgpoBJ p1NIiC2tG8tivNYuNtf+EhM= =OoRG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-axj5Xk7jiD051c87fTyg--