From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: CDC_RAM for lk 2.4, PATCH proposed
Date: 21 May 2004 09:28:06 -0600
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1085153286.6103.24.camel@patibmrh9>
References: <20040520080622.GF1952@suse.de><1085090500.3822.20.camel@patibm
	rh9>  <20040521065312.GK1952@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:7152 "EHLO
	email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265893AbUEUP2P
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 May 2004 11:28:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20040521065312.GK1952@suse.de>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John McKell <McKellj@iomega.com>

> > diff -Nurp linux-2.4.27-pre3/... linux-2.4.27-pre3-pel/...
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Patch looks fine to me,
> I'll send it to Marcelo for inclusion. Thanks!

Wonderful news, thank you both, consequently now with more hope I look
forward to writing kernel patches exclusively for 2.6.

> Your 2.4.18 patch is a hack.

Yes.

> No point in debating ...

I agree I will not now confirm my new understanding of what the word
"bogus" means to you.

Pat LaVarre